• 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s chromium, it does that ambient color changing shit I hate, it “anticipates my needs” instead of just waiting my my instruction. This is a browser designed to make me angry.

    • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tried it for a bit, even daily drove it on my laptop for a while. It has a pretty slick interface, and uses containers so you could, for example, have one container that you are logged into your google account for (say, Youtube), and the rest of your containers you can not log into Google.

      The downside is that 1) It’s still not mature as of a month ago. They are making massive changes and adding new features constantly, and 2) It’s still Chromium, so all of the downsides of that are still present.

      If they switch to using Firefox or another open-source foundation, I’d be all over it.

      • otacon239@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Firefox already has containers. I still have yet to see a browser that beats stock Firefox in functionality, customization and privacy

          • otacon239@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is the key. There are a few projects that can beat it in one way or another, but not all 3. Every project that beats FF in a functional way ends up sacrificing privacy. And those that somehow beat it in privacy are underdeveloped and run into weird compatibility issues or are missing support for key plugins.

            • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Chrome is run by a massive corporation with a reputation for for invasions of privacy. Opera is run by a nation state with a reputation for invasions of privacy.

              Vivaldi is far better than either of those.

        • godless@latte.isnot.coffee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          On mobile I’d suggest Fennec instead of stock Firefox since you can use add-ons without limitation, and don’t need workarounds such as the Firefox nightly.

          It’s basically stock with enabled add-ons, and following the official release cycle with 2-3 days delay. Maintained by the original developers of the F-Droid store, so also a highly trustworthy source IMHO.

  • OtakuAltair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    anyone

    Lol, it’s just on mac. No windows version or even plans for a Linux one. Not that I’d use another chromium fork.

  • borlax@lemmy.borlax.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s just chrome with different pitched bells and whistles.

    Give me some WebKit based alternatives or something interesting…

    • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why they target Apple users. They don’t understand what closed source means, nor care. They just want flashy new thing.

          • Digital Mark@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Safari is a very thin set of changes to WebKit, you can just run & build WebKit nightlies, which I do for web dev, so I don’t screw up my main browser. You have zero idea what you’re talking about, you just read a wiki page.

            Macs let you run anything you want, obviously. iOS does, too, as long as you’re a developer sideloading. People who can’t hit compile shouldn’t be allowed to run random shit on their phones which are 2FA etc. keys.

            • On@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Safari is a very thin set of changes to WebKit, you can just run & build WebKit nightlies,

              you don’t seem to understand software licenses, so please stop overselling yourself. Just because a software uses open source code, it doesn’t automatically become open-source. You’re first claim was Safari is open-source. It’s not

              and compiling a browser for webdev. lol

  • Eddie@lemmy.lucitt.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thought I’d throw my opinion into the ring here, since literally every comment is shitting on this.

    Arc is a design project, that also happens to be a web browser. If you’re just calling this “another chromium fork”, I think you’re completely missing the point of who this product is for. First of all, it’s not for you.

    Secondly, the design changes that arc is working on perfecting are pretty groundbreaking. The ability to customize the css and functionality of any web page without code and it saves your profiles for future use with a marketplace is super interesting to me. So much UI on modern websites is entirely unnecessary. As a designer, this is a dream.

    Also, nobody is mentioning that their working on a Windows version THAT NATIVELY RUNS SWIFT ON WINDOWS. This is a big deal for future cross compatibility in general, why are so many people not looking at this?

    Anyway that’s my rant. Trying to voice my opinions even if they’re the odd ones out to prevent a Lemmy based echo chamber. Feel free to disagree.

    • pkulak@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well why didn’t you say we get cool trinkets and shiny doodads?! That’s totally worth handing control over the entire internet to a single corporation.

    • halva@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      what’s the big deal about swift?? the language has been cross-platform for quite some time now, it’s just there wasn’t much point for it on neither windows nor linux outside of “oh look i can write a hello world in swift”

      good on them for utilizing it but I don’t think it’s revolutionary or anything

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The whole problem is that the free internet is dying because google is starting to get a monopoly over it.

      So, yes, “just another Chromium browser” is a very valid criticism, because it quite literally aids in jeopardizing the future of the internet.

    • On@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ability to customize the css and functionality of any web page without code

      Isn’t that something other browsers have been able to do for ages with add-ons like stylus, greasemonkey and others. it doesn’t seem all that groundbreaking.

      People might be hesitant to download a different browser what they can accomplish with a simple addon.

  • Lionir [he/him]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The organization features that I’ve seen look really nice. I’ve also wanted something as easy as Safari tab groups… None of these ideas seem to trickle down to other browsers though, it’s a shame

  • Einar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Chromium - and thus Google - dominates the Internet way too much. This causes trouble and has the potential to cause a lot more trouble in the future.

    This has been discussed many times before, of course.