Suprized?
- If you upload something and don’t pay, then the reason they’re hosting it for you is access to your data - deleted by creator 
 
- No, not surprised. Also not bothered. When I post something in public I expect it to be seen. 
- no shit 
- Smoked meats 
- Isn’t it obvious? I bet every other AI companies do the same. Honestly I think personalized models, for ads, tracking or whatever other purposes, are much worse than this but people have been happily living with it for a long time. - If you don’t want your data to be used, don’t put it on internet. 
- To all of you people trying to fight for image copyright lawsuits against stability AI - this is what you’re fighting for. AI out of your control and in the hands of people like meta instead of your own 
- Joke’s on them, I only post AI-generated images 
- This is the best summary I could come up with: 
 - Posts that were fed to the new AI include both text and photos, Nick Clegg, Meta’s president of global affairs, told Reuters in a Thursday interview. - Meta has some measures to exclude private details from public datasets used by the AI, Clegg told Reuters. - Emu was trained using photos from Instagram and Facebook posts, while Llama 2 used other public data sets, a Meta spokesperson told Insider in a statement. - Clegg added that he expects some people to legally contest whether training AI with copyrighted content is fair use, per Reuters. - Authors, artists, and developers have been suing AI companies and firms like Meta over concerns that their work is being used without their consent to train a technology that could undermine their careers. - Facebook and Instagram users own the content that they post as long as it doesn’t infringe on someone else’s intellectual property rights, per Meta’s policies. 
 - The original article contains 356 words, the summary contains 149 words. Saved 58%. I’m a bot and I’m open source! 






