nice little blogpost where someone reviews music players

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Still using Aqualung. However, my only requirements for a player are that it handle local files, handle m3u playlists, and not try to force a “music library” system on me (Aqualung offers it as an option only, which I’ve been ignoring for something like a decade and a half).

  • JakoJakoJako13@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Mpd+ncmpcpp for almost 15 years here. Album art would be nice but I don’t look at my music player long enough to care that much. Its always thrown on a far away workspace.

    Yes I tried Kew and Rmpc. Hell I cloned Rmpc and rewrote it from scratch to try and learn Rust. They’re both neat projects but not enough for me to switch. Especially Kew. That one requires some reprogramming of the brain. I’m good right now.

  • anorangecatnamedbillie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’ve been using Elisa music player, a kde app, for a while now. It’s relatively simple to use, required no setup and the user experience is pleasant.

    I use it to manage my library of a couple thousand songs in lossless formats (about 100GB worth) with no performance issues.

    I get music from ripping old CDs or from Qobuz, that lets you download DRM free music after purchasing and album or a subscription

  • scttgard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have been using JRiver Media Center for over 20 years, started on Windows and they have a perfect Linux and Mac versions. More options and features than I would ever use. It just works, best player I have ever used.

    jriver.com

    • glibg@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      This looks interesting, I will give it a try one of these days.

      My gold standard for audio players is MusicBee because I LOVE the album art view, where if you click on an album it “folds open” the songs without taking you away from the album art view. I couldn’t find a Linux player with a comparable feature, and I tried a bunch of them. I wish I wasn’t so particular about my music player but it seems everyone is, hence the many different software.

  • I'm glad Fooyin got an honorary mention, because that's all I need:

    Update: After reading through many comments, a lot of people mentioned their affinity for foobar2000-style players, and fooyin came up as the most frequent suggestion. I haven’t tested it, but it seems to be very popular. If you want even more options, fooyin comes highly recommended by a lot of people.

    • djdarren@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Heh, clicked on that and saw my post at the top. That threw me for a second.

      As an update, I’ve since worked out how to get Navidrome working over Tailscale and an Nginx redirect from my VPS, so I now have Feishin installed on several computers, all drawing from the same Navidrome server at home.

      It’s pretty cool.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      has it been updated since? i always enjoy talking music players

      edit: hey! found my old comment! also some folk i think are my dorks from my old college days maybe i hope? if they’re using the same usernames that’d be wild and fun. i wonder if i should break out my old cult username.

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agreed. It is my player of choice, though being it is pure Python, it uses a lot of resources for a music player. If I was tight on ram or using a slower CPU, I’d probably go with something leaner.

      • flameleaf@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        What a strange take. When I first switched to Linux in ~2009 I tried a ton of other players. Weirdly, Quod Libet was the only performant option back then. Amarok, Rhythmbox, Banshee, Clementine, etc all chugged to load my library with their UIs freezing for upwards of half an hour before I had something usable. Quod Libet just worked.

        Right now it’s using 598MB with a music library of ~31K songs.

          • flameleaf@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I did cut back significantly since that initial switch. At one point, I had 1TB of music. Right now it’s sitting at ~210MB of mp3s. Quod Libet uses less RAM than Firefox, Thunderbird, or RSSHub, but it is sitting at 4th place on my system.

            I don’t think there’s a way to scale music libraries to these obscene sizes without impacting RAM. Unless you manage it strictly with a file manager and open album folders individually with a lightweight player used only for playback.

            • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I agree that a large library will always heavily increase the ram usage, but Quod Libet is just less efficient in this regard than some others. I still use it as I like it best and it has done the best at filling the niche that foobar2000 did for me in Windows (minus the insane UI customization ability). Being in Python also makes it super easy to extend. It isn’t even close to 4th on my system in memory consumption, but my PC does triple duty as it is my dev workstation, media server, and personal PC. I’m actually shocked that RSSHub uses so much! Is that also a case of a large “library” of sorts?

              • flameleaf@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                nodejs + thousands of feeds processed every hour, so I’m gonna go with yes

                Firefox is for opening links that appear in Thunderbird with my current workflow, RSSHub generates the vast majority of them

    • jcarax@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I absolutely adore being able to click into and between genres and artists to get to albums and songs instantly. I want to ultimately move back to MPD, maybe Navidrome or Subsonic, but… I just love Quod Libet.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      i’ve always been a “organize everything at the file system level, and just play folders on demand in winamp” type guy… so when i couldn’t find a good winamp replacement after switching to linux, i ended up on quod libet and got used to organizing everything via tagging

      quod libet was a bit overwhelming at first and forced me to fix a lot of broken tags, but totally worth it.

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I like being exposed to new applications, but Elisa should’ve come up in the author’s search as kdePackages.elisa. Especially if you’re using KDE (where the Qt UI blends in well), it plainly meets all four of the criteria for inclusion. It’s such a major oversight given its popularity.