- Give me a Technology Connections (@[email protected]) video on it - That was literally my first thought when I saw the article. - God, I love that man - “I’m about to talk about Christmas lights for an 70 minutes.” - “Hell yeah, bro!” - “This goofy fridge has a really clever design. It’s also kinda terrible.” - 63 minutes long, and still super enjoyable. 
 
 
 
- Oh, I so want that! 
 
- I like the sounds of the tines! It’s basically just a tuning fork, so wild. - I’m old and still call the remote “the clicker”. My 7 year old wondered what the heck a clicker is. - Cue old dad “back in my day, the remotes actually clicked” story. - @reverendz @dingus, when I was young, I was the remote 
 
 
- deleted by creator - Yes! Those channel knobs were so easily broken. I thought we were the only ones turning channels with pair of vice-grips clamped on the nub. 
 
- I had a Heathkit TV that used a variation of this design! If you held it really close to your ear then you could actually hear it emitting. 
- This was mentioned a couple of weeks ago on the Vergecast. I was wondering if someone was going to get assigned the article, and here it is! 
- That’s fancy. Our clicker only had two buttons for channel changing. 
- Never seen or heard from anyone using tape to mask their remotes. Is this really a thing? - Never seen or heard from anyone using tape to mask their remotes. Is this really a thing? - Not this exactly, but my grandparents had a guide taped to the backside of their remotes to make it easier to use. - The tape strategy has some appeal, though, mainly in that I use maybe 5 buttons 95% of the time. 
 
- @igalmarino In my childhood our remote worked by emitting electronically generated ultrasonic sounds. It looked like that one: kleinanzeigen.de/s-anzeige/tel… 
- Those don’t take batteries and your click generates the electricity for the signal. Right? Like a wind up radio. - No, it’s a tuning fork that produces 4 seperate tones, one for each “button.” The TV had a microphone listening for tones and would respond accordingly. You didn’t actually have to point the remote at the TV, which later became a problem, as the mic on the TV was technically always listening for a tone. - Neat. I knew I could Cunningham Law this instead of doing research. - You can always count on fucking nerds to get excited about explaining something. - Cool. Now, where can we go to talk about CBB? - heynong.social? probably nowhere. or some weird earwolf forum. 
 
 
- Unfortunately, you violated the law slightly by asking a question! - Cunningham’s Law states “the best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; it’s to post the wrong answer.” 
 
 
- Nope! It’s the sound that does the work. The TV has a microphone in it. 
 
- What I loved about these remotes is you could take out a set of car keys and shake them and watch the channel changer go berserk. 







