• 404found@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    The core issue is that humans naturally conflate fluency with certainty. When a person isn’t sure about something, we pick up on subtle, non-verbal cues—a furrowed brow, a slight hesitation, a defensive tone, or qualifying phrases like “I think.”

    AI systems don’t have those micro-expressions. Because they are optimized to generate polished, statistically plausible language, they serve up a total hallucination with the exact same calm, authoritative syntax as a verified historical fact.

    -Google Gemini

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      You see this all the time in human form as well. Many public input meetings for a proposed building should have the plans drawn with a crayon (or at least some plugin to make it look like that). The conversation changes when you make things look like a quick drawing as opposed to the final results.