Have strong opinions, but I welcome any civil fact-based discussion.
Mastodon: @[email protected]
If she was masterful, there wouldn’t be anything to overturn. But it already happened, and most lawyers say it will happen again in relation to the documents case.
Her corruption just delayed everything, not actually stopped it.
What are the chances this gets overturned on appeal in the future due to judicial incompetence leading to material errors?
I’m not sure if it’s spelled out in the ToS, but there is no way to prevent pull requests on public repos, it’s a functional requirement.
You have to make a fork aka copy and modify to contribute via pull requests. The license is fundamentally broken.
Don’t take this as an insult, but you really need to come back when there is an independent audit that confirms the claims. Verifying cryptography is not something even a tech-savvy person can do, even if the source code is available.
I noticed this today too, no idea what is going on. Need to reach out to the instance admin, since it’s only happening on my instance as far as I can see.
McAfee blog offers some more details: https://www.mcafee.com/blogs/other-blogs/mcafee-labs/new-android-spyagent-campaign-steals-crypto-credentials-via-image-recognition/
Added to the post body.
I don’t like the community consolidation happening on lemmy.world
due to its size, so when possible I try to create alternatives elsewhere. lemmy.zip
is an established instance with multiple admins, transparent finances and reasonable defederation policy.
Mattermost is only source-available due to their dual licensing.
There were warrants issued on March 25 to him and his brother, which were ignored.
Probably not, since they did cover a presidential candidate and other speakers are not the ones running.
It was legal bribery long before the recent ruling. That just expended the scope of what they consider legal bribery.
Try FreeTube.
Instance blocking only hides communities from that instance, but not users.
You are correct, I somehow got confused… It was v1.2.0 release, I updated my original post. The release didn’t even mention the license change. https://github.com/eythaann/Seelen-UI/releases/tag/v1.2.0
It’s not mentioned, but I think the compatibility layer for 1.19 releases breaks support for older versions. Ask your instance admins to update the backend.
It’s another fake open source license. While source code is public under the license, you can’t modify or republish so if the project decides to sell you are fucked.
v1.2.0 release changed the license from MIT to PolyForm Strict License 1.0.0 which removes ability to re-publish and make changes to the project. In the day when fake open source projects sell out daily, it’s a good sign to avoid this project.
So which is it?