
I boycotted for a bit, refusing to buy anything from there unless there was nowhere else to get it.
Now I’m not so much boycotting them as I’ve forgotten their existence and need never return. They are just a much of square footage adjacent to an out the way outdoor mall that’s half dead. Unless I need to stop into a GameStop, which is at most once a year, that’s just a little piece of town there’s no reason to be in.




Yes. This agrees with my personal thesis: AI is a tool experts can use to do work more efficiently, not a product to replace experts.
I might even conceive of it as a bell curve. It allows novices to accomplish novice-level tasks they never could on their own. It allows experts to work more efficiently. But it doesn’t help mid-tier users to produce expert results and their AI assisted efforts still need to be vetted by experts.
And expertise needs to be qualified. I’ve been developing software for thirty years, but I’ve never done video game work. I can validate such code is well structured, but I couldn’t say whether it’s doing the right things or put together in the right way.
We are also probably going to have to think about how software is currently architected. Rich classes might have to give way to separating structure from functions. This allows an expert human to go from a more wholistic approach to thinking about composing functions and overall code structure.
AI is pretty good if you can limit the scope and context of a given prompt. With the benefit that if AI just can’t get it, a mid-level practitioner can step in.