There are few things quite as emblematic of late stage capitalism than the concept of “planned obsolescence”.

  • bedrooms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That slowness was, at least officially, for the battery health. Do you have the support to prove otherwise?

    • supercheesecake@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      These conversations bring the weirdest people out of the woodwork. I remember talking with a guy who explained to me how crap Apple laptops were because you (according to him) can’t customise them. Turns out he’d never owned or even used an Apple laptop. I was like, why do you care?! Especially about something you have no experience with!

    • Boiscull@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And then if I recall correctly (though I can’t be bothered to look) didn’t they get sued for slowing phones?

      So people were mad that their phones battery wasn’t holding a charge anymore, “im being forced to upgrade”, so Apple throttled older phones to keep the battery running, aka allowing people to keep their phones longer, and then they got sued for slowing down phones lol.

      I am an apple fan boy, I wont hide that. But it does seem like they tried to do a “good” and make peoples phones last longer, and then got sued.

      Also the whole forced upgrade just isn’t apples game IMO. Do they want you buying the new one every year, of course. But the more important thing is that you keep using AN iPhone at all. Stay in the ecosystem, stay in the app store, stay paying for icloud, etc.

      Going to a new phone gives the user a window to move away from IOS. (Though most won’t haha)