• iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’d rather be a bad programmer that gets stuff done than a good programmer who’s just jerking off about proper design

    t. good programmer

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Once you move past a couple thousand LOC, you’ll appreciate having an easily modifiable, modular design you had the foresight to plan out.

      Or you can just trawl through thousand of lines of unstructured spaghetti code trying to figure out where to shoehorn your new feature in like a QBasic/Arduino kid.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’ve never appreciated design decisions made before starting to code. I always have to refactor later when my requirements change or when I realize there’s a better way to do something.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        It depends, if you work in a statically typed language you can just use a tool to refactor. I bet a ton of advice is from JavaScript programmers where it’s simply not safe to do this.

        My first job doing JavaScript I realized the IDE’s refactor tool wasn’t aware that two variables of the same name were in fact a different variable. Due to how scoping works, it’s hard to write a reliable tool to rename variables for JS. I accidentally introduced a bug renaming a variable.