• OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      So your argument is the geographical boundaries mean when a country is split it is imperialism to unite it again?

      Imagine if the confederacy retreated to the keys islands, that’s sort of the level of ridiculous here. The right wing losers of a civil war retreated to an island that was and is considered part of the country.

      • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I would go even further. If a country exists and everybody has a national identity, all happy citizens. Then one region decides to become separatist. If the rest of the country doesn’t let them separate, I would qualify that as imperialism as well.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Have you read anything on what imperialism actually is?

          I would suggest reading Lenin’s “Imperialism”