Spectre@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoTrickflationcdn.masto.hostimagemessage-square189fedilinkarrow-up11.16Karrow-down119file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.14Karrow-down1imageTrickflationcdn.masto.hostSpectre@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square189fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareRedex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down3·1 year agoTops are pretty much standars size on all cans I’m pretty sure. So that part should be constant.
minus-squarefrank@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-21 year agoThat looks like a 202 vs a 200 can end, so a “sleek” not a “slim” (red bull can is slim) The sleek can is 355 ml and uses a 200 end. As for which uses more aluminum… Good question. It’s probably close
Tops are pretty much standars size on all cans I’m pretty sure. So that part should be constant.
That looks like a 202 vs a 200 can end, so a “sleek” not a “slim” (red bull can is slim)
The sleek can is 355 ml and uses a 200 end.
As for which uses more aluminum… Good question. It’s probably close