• bluefirex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    RAM usage is RAM usage, and besides the allocation still being awful and you probably having less RAM available in a heavy task, this means substantial power consumption, that costs money.

    Unused RAM is wasted RAM. Even if it’s just the OS keeping apps on memory for faster launches. If you do need heavy RAM for a task your OS is clever enough to reshuffle things.

    Used RAM does use more electricity but that is so neglible it’s a non-issue and no argument.

    Of my 32 GB at least 26 GB are constantly in use.

    • Raphaël A. Costeau@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Even if it’s just the OS keeping apps on memory for faster launches. If you do need heavy RAM for a task your OS is clever enough to reshuffle things.

      The problem is that when it is relocated, processor consumption increases. And as matter of fact, my operating system doesn’t cache anything and still opens applications very quickly, even faster than Windows.

      Used RAM does use more electricity but that is so neglible it’s a non-issue and no argument.

      Maybe isn’t a issue to you but for anyone with a laptop it is and it’s pretty visible.

      CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

      • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What processor are you using, a 486? Memory management should be effectively instant on any modern platform.

        I also find it extremely hard to believe that your unspecified OS doesn’t do any caching. Even vxworks does caching.