• MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    But we should, because plastic is made of oil. And that oil goes CO², be it because it’s burned or because it rots away in nature.

    • Mallspice@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Environmental stability is very important but we should master how we use materials, not discount their usefulness entirely, as that is more empowering to our species.

      Like sure we can make oil cars outdated and that may be a good thing, but we’d still use it in grease.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        There are many cases where a chemical had to be entirely replaced with a more targeted or less damaging variant because of environmental considerations. Most prominent being CTFE, because it affected the ozone layer.

        • Mallspice@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I think grease is the better example. Interesting. Is it actually feasible to phase out crude oil?

          • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Yeah, bad example, i rewrote my answer.

            And yeah, i think so. Problem currently is, that alternatives are more expensive. That could be solved with oil production and export being appropriately taxed to the damages it causes.