• gaael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I seem to remember it was not a ionization issue but something with local temperatures increases around the ear when you were using it without an earset.

    Anyway, Apples knows what the norms are, decided not to care, gets caught and has to retire a phone, nothing exceptional here.

    • marmarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I doubt they’d have to retire the phone - digital radio power levels are normally pretty easy to change in the radio firmware. Which also means it’s pretty easy to change, intentionally or unintentionally, in a later OS version.

      Perhaps Apple chose to cheat to improve reception after mandatory testing was complete and the phone was available to buy, figuring they’d never get caught out. Perhaps Apple didn’t retest with later OS versions and it was unintentional. We will probably never know.

    • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What does retire it mean? They no longer sell it on their website, same goes for the 13 mini after yesterdays iPhone 15 announcement. They’re telling Apple to retire it when Apple was already retiring it. What was achieved here?

      Why didn’t they find this 3 years ago when it may have mattered?

      • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They could have changed things through updates which exacerbated the issue and made the modem emit more.

        I have no clue if that is why but that would be my bet.

        I’m kind of surprised they would have been able to release the device and ship it to customers with that issue in the first place.