The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

  • Hubi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is this different from a human doing an impersonation?

      • cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This, and it’s not a human. All these analogies trying to liken a learning algorithm to a learning human are not correct. An LLM is not a human.

        • idiomaddict@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, but if “things” is replaced by scamming artists, that’s a shitty society

          • Armok: God of Blood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Artists aren’t being scammed. They’re being replaced by automated systems. It’s the same thing that happened to weavers and glassblowers. The issue isn’t that their job is being automated. It’s that people replaced by automation aren’t compensated. Blame the game, not the players.

            • gregorum@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s much closer to having glass blowing artists designs, perfectly replicated in an automated fashion, and at scale— and without compensation to the artist. I would argue that it is tantamount to being scammed.

              • Armok: God of Blood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                In this specific case, it’s more like a bunch of glassblowers were being paid to make designs on behalf of a company. Then they went on strike, and the company decided it would be cheaper to replicate their designs with an automated system than to meet the workers’ demands.

                • idiomaddict@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The strike came after the jobs began to be replaced. They can currently mimic a few glass blown designs, and the strike is aimed at making sure that glass blowers don’t give more ammo to the animators.

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t think it’s a particularly odious mental challenge to understand that we’re not upset about the general concept of doing things at scale, and that it depends on what the thing in question is.

          For instance, you’d probably not be terribly upset about me randomly approaching you on the street once - mildly annoyed at most. You’d probably be much more upset if I followed you around 24/7 every time you entered a public space and kept badgering you.

    • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      You know what the difference is, trying to act otherwise is just being obtuse.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was a difference between complete duplication and impersonation for the purposes of satire.