return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前Audible unveils plans to use AI voices to narrate audiobookswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square192fedilinkarrow-up1391arrow-down120
arrow-up1371arrow-down1external-linkAudible unveils plans to use AI voices to narrate audiobookswww.theguardian.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前message-square192fedilink
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-24 个月前Yep, copyright doesn’t apply to AI generated content. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-appeals-court-rejects-copyrights-ai-generated-art-lacking-human-creator-2025-03-18/#%3A~%3Atext=U.S.+Circuit+Judge+Patricia+Millett+wrote+for%2Cthe+first+instance+by+a+human+being." (edit: the original book copyright would still apply however… So would only be public domain if the book itself was also public domain)
minus-squarexor@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 个月前you couldn’t pay me to listen to an AI narrated book
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-24 个月前Me too: there’s just something about how repetitive thier cadence can be, and putting random infections and stresses on words where it doesn’t make sense.
minus-squareThreeme2189@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 个月前How about I spin up an AI model that outputs a near 1:1 copy of the training data? Does that circumvent the copyright?
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-24 个月前Duno, probably to some extent, similarly to how remixes of music sometimes have to pay royalties to the source of the sample if it’s recognisable…? Actually would probably be more similar to the George Carlin AI impersonation lawsuit , but they settled, so idk.
Yep, copyright doesn’t apply to AI generated content.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-appeals-court-rejects-copyrights-ai-generated-art-lacking-human-creator-2025-03-18/#%3A~%3Atext=U.S.+Circuit+Judge+Patricia+Millett+wrote+for%2Cthe+first+instance+by+a+human+being."
(edit: the original book copyright would still apply however… So would only be public domain if the book itself was also public domain)
free AI read audiobooks coming up
you couldn’t pay me to listen to an AI narrated book
Me too: there’s just something about how repetitive thier cadence can be, and putting random infections and stresses on words where it doesn’t make sense.
How about I spin up an AI model that outputs a near 1:1 copy of the training data?
Does that circumvent the copyright?
Duno, probably to some extent, similarly to how remixes of music sometimes have to pay royalties to the source of the sample if it’s recognisable…?
Actually would probably be more similar to the George Carlin AI impersonation lawsuit , but they settled, so idk.