• adeoxymus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Super cool plot! Few questions, I was trying to read the scale bar. It says RTT/(1-(2*distance/c)). I guess that’s a typo? otherwise I’m not sure what it would mean.

    Then the scaling goes up to 10, did you multiply by 10 or did you inverse the values? (Inverting would mean higher values = lower connectivity? which I guess is possible in Europe if we have to consider the routing ?).
    Also it’s very interesting how uniform the whole American continent is.

    • kernelle@0d.gsOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ah yeah ofcourse I was experimenting with comparing it with the lightspeed itself, then inverting it with -1 so its coloured correctly. My mistake not changing the label enough.

      Then the scaling goes up to 10

      That is actually the real scale, in Europe we get theoretical speeds of 2-3ms according to the speed of light. Real RTT’s in Amsterdam for example are around 20ms, so you get values >10. The further you go from the EU, the closer to ideal times.

      It’s interesting to see the places where connectivity is much better or worse than the surrounding areas.

      • adeoxymus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Alright thanks! so it means you’re showing RTT theoretical/RTT actual? That makes sense!

        • kernelle@0d.gsOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That was experimenting, the actual graph shown is the other way around, so it shows the real differences, not just compared to lightspeed (ie I forgot to remove the ‘1 -’ from the label)