• Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    If you read the resolution and the answers of national governments why they abstained, the answer is found in points 4 and 14 of the resolution, where everyone who fought against the anti-Hitler coalition is condemned and equivocated with nazi-sympathisers. This does include people who opportunistically fought againt the Red Army in the baltic states and Ukraine for national liberation from the USSR, but not necessarily on the german side.

    Yes, some of those “national liberation fighters” were absolute shitbag nazi scum, but not all of them were and history is generally more complex than just good and bad.

    There was a movement to restrict those two points to language that does not automatically include these anti-soviet forces among the ranks of the nazis, but the changes were not adopted.

    Some politicians posit the hypothesis that the resolution was worded in such a way through russian string pulling, because they wanted to be able to paint every anti-russian fighter in the time of the second world war as pro-Hitler.

    • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yes, some of those “national liberation fighters” were absolute shitbag nazi scum, but not all

      If you are fighting against the Allies alongside “shitbag Nazi scum,” you are a Nazi sympathizer.

      The vast majority of the world sees this clearly.