It was a film about Madame Web, there is no universe in which that could have a good script at any point of its production. It was evident from the same idea that it was a bad idea
What a dumb statement. Competent and passionate people can make any idea fun and engaging. This was 100% a cash grab and they hooked everyone with a bait and switch script.
Edit: Just because none of those people were involved in this film doesn’t invalidate the point. If anything it reinforces it.
The competent and passionate people can do that, can you point out someone competent and passionate involved at some point in the development of this film?
I would encourage you to not speak so assuredly about how successful an adaptation can or cannot be based solely on source material.
Filmmaking is hard work, made even more difficult by executive producers who think their opinion should be weighted over that of the creative team. I’ve seen this first-hand, and I’ve watched projects I’ve been excited to take on turn sour.
Yeah, sure, making a movie is hard work and deserves recognition, but when you tell me that a film like Bortherlands, for example, was ruined by the executives, I can believe that. However, if you tell me that behind Madame Web there was a creative team with great ideas and that the executives were the ones who ruined it… well, honestly, I don’t buy that. Especially because no creative had any real input on the movie at any point—it was 100% decided and driven by the executives.
It was a film about Madame Web, there is no universe in which that could have a good script at any point of its production. It was evident from the same idea that it was a bad idea
What a dumb statement. Competent and passionate people can make any idea fun and engaging. This was 100% a cash grab and they hooked everyone with a bait and switch script.
Edit: Just because none of those people were involved in this film doesn’t invalidate the point. If anything it reinforces it.
The competent and passionate people can do that, can you point out someone competent and passionate involved at some point in the development of this film?
That’s not the argument.
I would encourage you to not speak so assuredly about how successful an adaptation can or cannot be based solely on source material.
Filmmaking is hard work, made even more difficult by executive producers who think their opinion should be weighted over that of the creative team. I’ve seen this first-hand, and I’ve watched projects I’ve been excited to take on turn sour.
It happens all the time.
Yeah, sure, making a movie is hard work and deserves recognition, but when you tell me that a film like Bortherlands, for example, was ruined by the executives, I can believe that. However, if you tell me that behind Madame Web there was a creative team with great ideas and that the executives were the ones who ruined it… well, honestly, I don’t buy that. Especially because no creative had any real input on the movie at any point—it was 100% decided and driven by the executives.
You just keep making up straw men.