• Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Garbage HDR support. But I think that’s more of a KDE issue. (IDK I’m not a Linux pro)

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 days ago

      x11 doesn’t support HDR at all, so even with HDR support still not being fully mature in KDE and GNOME that’s a argument for wayland.

    • murvel@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      HDR support is the whole reason for picking Wayland and anyhow I don’t see whats so bad about it.

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago
        1. It doesn’t work properly (desaturates colors instead of making them appear more saturated)
        2. No support for RTX HDR, so if your video/game doesn’t have native HDR support, you’re playing it in SDR. Which is a deal-breaker for me because even converted content looks far superior to SDR.
      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Yeah but HDR monitors have been mainstream for over a decade now. What’s taking so long? I’m tired of Windows, but I’m not fully switching to Linux until they sort this shit. That includes adding support for RTX HDR and RTX Video Enhancement.