Schools and lawmakers are grappling with how to address a new form of peer-on-peer image-based sexual abuse that disproportionately targets girls.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Suppose I’m a teenager attracted to people my age. Or suppose I’m medically a pedophile, which is not a crime, and then I would need that.

          In any case, for legal and moral purposes “why would you want” should be answered only with “not your concern, go eat shit and die”.

          • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I feel like you didn’t read my comment thoroughly enough. I said it can constitue CSAM. There is a surprising amount of leewat for teenagers of course.

            But no, I’m not gonna let you get away that easily. I want to know the why you think it’s morally okay for an adult to draw sexually explicit images of children. Please, tell me how that’s okay?

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Because morally it’s not your fucking concern what others are doing in supposed privacy of their personal spaces.

              It seems to be a very obvious thing your nose doesn’t belong there and you shouldn’t stick it there.

              But no, I’m not gonna let you get away that easily.

              I don’t need any getting away from you, you’re nothing.

              • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                No. That’s not a good enough excuse to potentially be abusing children.

                I can’t think of a single good reason to draw those kinds of things. Like at all. Please, give me a single good reason.

                • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  No. That’s not a good enough excuse to potentially be abusing children.

                  It’s good enough for the person whose opinion counts, your doesn’t. And there’s no such potential.

                  I can’t think of a single good reason to draw those kinds of things. Like at all.

                  Too bad.

                  Please, give me a single good reason.

                  To reinforce that your opinion doesn’t count is in itself a good reason. The best of them all really.

                  • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    Okay so you have no reason. Which is because having sexually explicit images, drawn or otherwise, is gross and weird and disturbing. And the fact that you are continually doubling down shows me that you likely need your hard drives and notebooks checked.

                    Please don’t respond again unless you are telling me what country you are from so I can report you to the appropriate authorities.