I read an article in the New York Times about Elon Musk wanting to make X, formally known as Twitter, into an everything app. The article also mentions other attempts. Would that be the last thing we would want?

I can see why Elon would want it: total domination of the app market and massive profits. While a user might find it convenient, it would be a total lock in to one app that would make it difficult to move to other apps. If the app went under, a likelihood for X under Elon’s control, the user becomes completely disconnected. The app would also be the dream target of hackers trying to steal all you data.

It’s not that hard to use multiple apps. I’m sure most of us have dozens of them. I have high security on my financial apps and not so much on my social apps. I don’t want to do two step verification to get back into kbin every time I get logged out. Specialize apps for specific purposes makes a lot more sense to me.

  • trynn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yep. Musk is basing his idea about having an “everything app” on WeChat’s success in China, which basically does what he’s talking about. The problem is that he doesn’t seem to understand that there are cultural differences at play between Chinese users and western users that prevent mass-adoption of a single app to do everything in the west, and that WeChat already exists and isn’t popular in the west at all.

    • iLikeGoats@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are more than cultural differences. WeChat is a surveillance app for the masses by the State. This is not an exaggeration.

    • QHC@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it a cultural difference, or is it a combination of China being a more restricted market and the first wave of smart phone apps being aimed primarily at the English-speaking world? I am sure some of the apps that Westerners use were not available in China, either because they weren’t allowed (e.g. financial services) or were not aimed at that market (e.g. Twitter), at least not initially.

      Reminds me of how in high school, my different friend groups used different IM clients, but it was just a fluke of which gained mass appeal first in each community.

      • bedrooms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think SNS is a mass game. When WeChat started my friends used it to hit random girls nearby. Just shake the phone and connect.

        Once it dominates a population you have no choice because none of your friends has a WhatsApp account.

      • trynn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a good point, but I’m fairly sure culture plays a part as well. It’s likely some combination.