• Jaderick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 年前

    peer reviewed properly

    Is the important bit here. The timeline from that Wikipedia article shows it was published in 2005 and work disproving it’s claim came around in 2006.

    If a scientists work is retracted it really kills any more funding they receive. They use examples like the DRBG one as what not to be.