ardi60@reddthat.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoGoogle's plan to restrict sideloading on Android has a potential escape hatch for userswww.androidauthority.comexternal-linkmessage-square268fedilinkarrow-up1537arrow-down112
arrow-up1525arrow-down1external-linkGoogle's plan to restrict sideloading on Android has a potential escape hatch for userswww.androidauthority.comardi60@reddthat.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square268fedilink
minus-squareEggyhead@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·3 days agoThey never specified who’s security…
minus-squareespentan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoTheir revenue probably felt very threatened.
minus-squareSCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·3 days agoWhose* Who’s = who + is Whose = an indication of possession
minus-squarek0e3@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 days agoI will always remember this grammar rule thanks to the show “Whose Line Is It Anyway?” because I would see that title every morning before school.
minus-squareEggyhead@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoThe question is still valid, even if the meaning changes.
They never specified who’s security…
Their revenue probably felt very threatened.
Whose*
Who’s = who + is
Whose = an indication of possession
I will always remember this grammar rule thanks to the show “Whose Line Is It Anyway?” because I would see that title every morning before school.
The question is still valid, even if the meaning changes.