• Rothe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    No it was never for the rights, and it was never for the jpeg. It was for a link to a jpeg which you didn’t own.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Right, I misspoke. The NFT proves you own a specific token related to the image. On that sense you “own” the image, but that doesn’t confer any additional rights to use/manipulate/redistribute/etc the image that others don’t have. All it does is prove that, on a given blockchain, you own that image/token of the image.