Ah, that is what you think is a good source. This whole conversation makes sense. Global times is literally state run media.
“The Global Times is a daily Chinese tabloid under the auspices of the Chinese Communist Party’s flagship newspaper, the People’s Daily, commenting on international issues from a Chinese nationalistic perspective” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Times
The west imprisons and kills journalists reporting intelligence snafus, and you want a prominent western source that documented one of the biggest intelligence snafus of the past decade?
No wonder you have no clue what the west is actually doing abroad.
Julian Assange, a journalist, was imprisoned for exposing that the US was killing journalists. At pro-Palestine protests across the country, police actively targeted press for arrests and assaults. The fucking president of the United States openly threatens journalists on camera.
Julian assange hand nothing to do with revealing the US killing journalists. Yeah, the current US government suppresses free press, it that is not even a fraction of what China does. It is absolutely absurd to call them a reliable source
So now you’re trying to deny the facts of one of the most prominent retaliations against a journalist in the past decade. How do you think that’s gonna slide? Seems like a pretty stupid way to burn your astroturf account.
And the hundreds of journalists that the US suppressed or imprisoned or killed? Those are nothing?
I genuinely have no idea what story you are talking about. Maybe it was the biggest story in whatever Chinese propaganda rag you mistake for legitimate journalism, but it doesn’t ring a bell for me.
Ah, that is what you think is a good source. This whole conversation makes sense. Global times is literally state run media.
“The Global Times is a daily Chinese tabloid under the auspices of the Chinese Communist Party’s flagship newspaper, the People’s Daily, commenting on international issues from a Chinese nationalistic perspective” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Times
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/global-times-china/
The west imprisons and kills journalists reporting intelligence snafus, and you want a prominent western source that documented one of the biggest intelligence snafus of the past decade?
No wonder you have no clue what the west is actually doing abroad.
You are repeating misinformation.
https://cpj.org/special-reports/in-record-year-china-israel-and-myanmar-are-worlds-leading-jailers-of-journalists/
Julian Assange, a journalist, was imprisoned for exposing that the US was killing journalists. At pro-Palestine protests across the country, police actively targeted press for arrests and assaults. The fucking president of the United States openly threatens journalists on camera.
What the fuck are you talking about, fed?
Zhang Zhen
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/09/china-journalist-zhang-zhan-sentenced-to-prison-again-on-baseless-charges/
Dong Yuyu
https://rsf.org/en/china-prominent-journalist-dong-yuyu-sentenced-prison-bogus-espionage-charges
And more than a hundred others
https://cpj.org/reports/2008/06/12iii-2/
Julian assange hand nothing to do with revealing the US killing journalists. Yeah, the current US government suppresses free press, it that is not even a fraction of what China does. It is absolutely absurd to call them a reliable source
So now you’re trying to deny the facts of one of the most prominent retaliations against a journalist in the past decade. How do you think that’s gonna slide? Seems like a pretty stupid way to burn your astroturf account.
And the hundreds of journalists that the US suppressed or imprisoned or killed? Those are nothing?
Okay, so provide information that proves my information is wrong. Or shut the fuck up
Asking about the basic facts of one of the most prominent stories of the past decade is the epitome of sea-lioning.
I genuinely have no idea what story you are talking about. Maybe it was the biggest story in whatever Chinese propaganda rag you mistake for legitimate journalism, but it doesn’t ring a bell for me.