• huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 days ago

    hah, using language to interface with the computer is for idiots, pointing and grunting is the superior method!

      • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        it also means that there’s a smooth transition between doing a thing once and doing it a 1000 times (or otherwise automating it), because you’ve got a programming language right there already. no need to look for a “mass-x gui tool” for each x.

        oh, and i think (though i have no actual experience with this) that it’s a lot easier to make terminals friendly for disabled people (blind, etc)

        • Ferk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          The CLI is also a much more reliable environment to provide instructions on how to do something.

          Instructing people to click on “this button > tab > menu > submenu > item” is very exhausting for both instructor and reader, it’s language-dependant and less future-proof. Also sometimes the location of some graphic elements isn’t immediately obvious and there are cases where the only way to make sure people understand it is with a video tutorial of sorts. Which is annoying both to make and to have to sit and watch through.

          This also makes the CLI better at reporting/diagnosing problems… for a GUI app, if you want to report a bug you have to write down a bible of steps on what things you clicked on, etc. (again, a video ultimately is needed to make things clear). Whereas a CLI app has all that information already in the parameters so you can just provide that as the report (along with any input/output data). Or simply copy the contents of your terminal.