No. Obviously any celebrity is going to be in situations like this at times. You may walk past a place where someone has been murdered, but that does not mean you are involved. When you’ve been spotted with blood on your clothing, and some people say you were there, and you know the murdered person, and you have been associating with other murderers, to say you are the same as someone just walking by is logically insane. To call that a conspiracy is to lack due diligence. There is a truth in the statistics, and the associations. When you are part of a toxic spurious culture, there will be many instances where one is photographed with members of the group. He was charged with rape and convicted. Giving the benefit of the doubt is foolish.
Argue with logic instead of guilt by association fallacy.
Where’s the “blood on their clothing”?
charged with rape and convicted
of adults.
Photos of public figures with practically anyone are expected.
Next, try the same approach with Madonna or any well-connected person.
Giving the benefit of the doubt
Merely logic: it isn’t conclusive.
The allegations existed for ages, yet the FBI under multiple Democratic & Republican administrations didn’t seem to act as though they had enough conclusive evidence to pursue charges: why is that?
So, this proves if everyone takes a photo with a celebrity, then everyone includes unsavory people?
No. Obviously any celebrity is going to be in situations like this at times. You may walk past a place where someone has been murdered, but that does not mean you are involved. When you’ve been spotted with blood on your clothing, and some people say you were there, and you know the murdered person, and you have been associating with other murderers, to say you are the same as someone just walking by is logically insane. To call that a conspiracy is to lack due diligence. There is a truth in the statistics, and the associations. When you are part of a toxic spurious culture, there will be many instances where one is photographed with members of the group. He was charged with rape and convicted. Giving the benefit of the doubt is foolish.
Argue with logic instead of guilt by association fallacy. Where’s the “blood on their clothing”?
of adults.
Photos of public figures with practically anyone are expected. Next, try the same approach with Madonna or any well-connected person.
Merely logic: it isn’t conclusive. The allegations existed for ages, yet the FBI under multiple Democratic & Republican administrations didn’t seem to act as though they had enough conclusive evidence to pursue charges: why is that?
The information is easily available. I don’t take anyone arguing seriously any more. There is no debate to be had.