There’s zero cost to using it instead of a div so the only reason not to use it is to purposefully screw users who need accessibility features.
No, the main reason is because people don’t know about it, because it’s an extra thing to remember for little benefit. Same reason other semantic-only tags like article get very little use.
only differ from div in styles
Err yeah the “only” do a really useful thing that lots of people want.
If output came with some nice styling and maybe animations… maybe a built in copy-to-clipboard option… then people would have used it.
the main reason is because people don’t know about it
But you know about it now and you’re still arguing against it.
it’s an extra thing to remember for little benefit
the “only” do a really useful thing that lots of people want.
The benefit you see in those tags is the same level of benefit that users who use accessibility features get from output and other semantic tags. But your argument seems to boil down to “I dont need accessibility features so i don’t care about enabling them for ppl who do”. That’s very disappointing and continuing this debate seems pointless so i’m gonna stop here
No I said it’s not very useful.
No, the main reason is because people don’t know about it, because it’s an extra thing to remember for little benefit. Same reason other semantic-only tags like
article
get very little use.Err yeah the “only” do a really useful thing that lots of people want.
If
output
came with some nice styling and maybe animations… maybe a built in copy-to-clipboard option… then people would have used it.But you know about it now and you’re still arguing against it.
The benefit you see in those tags is the same level of benefit that users who use accessibility features get from
output
and other semantic tags. But your argument seems to boil down to “I dont need accessibility features so i don’t care about enabling them for ppl who do”. That’s very disappointing and continuing this debate seems pointless so i’m gonna stop here