CBP Enforces Binary Sex Codes and Enhanced US Passport Validation in APIS


Sex Field Requirements: Effective Oct. 14, 2025, CBP systems will only accept “M” (Male) or “F” (Female) in the sex field of APIS transmissions. Any other characters will result in an “X Response-Insufficient Information” error, requiring airlines to resubmit the passenger data with corrected information.

    • smh@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yep. When traveling, I want to be as inconspicuous as possible. No X for me, no matter how affirming it would feel.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        i saw at least 1 video/short, about a bunch lgbtq+ were discussing how people were afraid of coming out now, or going back in the closet after partially coming out. over the anti0-trans shit, and it harms the rest of the lgbtq+ community as well. ultimately it goes back to controlling women/pregnancies in general down the line.

    • nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 days ago

      I almost. I spent a long time trying to figure out if it would make it easier or harder to travel if things took a fascist turn.

      Yep. They turned it into a List for discrimination.

      Best clapback is X marker for all or remove sex from ID altogether. No more official excuse to violate everyone’s HIPPA and ask intrusive questions.

      Breeding status has nothing to do with anything I use a civil ID for. It’s for proving my age to clubs and stores, and tax jurisdiction for elections and taxes.

        • smh@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Beg pardon, I’m not sure I understand what you’re saying. Could you please define “this” and “backpassing”?

          (I’m not sure if you’re calling the parent post bullshit for suggesting ID without gender markings, or saying having to revert ID is bullshit. If the later: I totally agree that having to lie on one’s ID for safety is hurtful bullshit.)

          • nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            Backpass, transgender community, as in “attempt to visually/socially pass as hospital sex+collonist beauty standards, usually to avoid negative sanctions if whatever scale.”

            Simmilar to “straight-passing” some queer people might do to stay safe or included at work or fam gatherings.

            ex https://transgenderindia.com/transition-transit-passing-legal-gender/

            (I wanted to link to a search(whichever engines), but the results are pretty clogged with civil rights trashfires compared to our community factsheets and forums results like 10 yrs ago.)

            • nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              it sounds deceptively binary, but is a holistic concept: not switching, but cutting off parts to fit into a system that denies medical and historical facts of intersex and transex existance.

              Hence violence. Not a lightswitch. Definitely free speech/agency canaries. Again, historically.

              • smh@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                So (if I read you right) the violence isn’t done by those that try to pass to avoid negative consequences, but by those that 1. enforce those negative consequences and those that 2. force IDs to fit into their artificial binary.

                That makes sense. Thank you for clarifying.

                Anecdote that helps me relate to the concept you described: A friend of mine has an extra pinky finger and it used to bother me–like, why hadn’t she had a surgical intervention so her hands more closely matched my concept of normal? Then I realized I should be happy that she didn’t feel the need to cut off a part of herself to fit in. Like my friend’s pinky, trans folk existing isn’t hurting anyone.

                • nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  1+2: Yes. Comprehension achieved.

                  I like your anecdote and think it will help others. Thanks for putting in some effort!