• zwerg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Honestly, it sounds like John was a problem and needed to be fired a long time ago, before he created this unmaintainable mess.

    • 4grams@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I work with John, my role is as the replacement for another John. I’m trying to be open and fix the issues, but they just want John back, and the other John who’s here, is so territorial, even when I try to help, he just tries to undermine and fight me.

      Fucking John.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I agree that John was the problem, but I think it was management responsibly to fix. Either through some coaching or as you say, before he became business-critical.

    • myotheraccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Every single other person could also be called the problem, because they knowingly let John do all the work, and apparently weren’t interested in sharing the responsibility.

      • bisby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If someone else is getting paid the most amount of money, I’m happy to let the most amount of work fall to them. “Sharing the responsibility” doesn’t make sense if I don’t get to share the reward. It’s a company, not a community or a family.