Six days ago, upgradeable laptop maker Framework tried to convince its fractious user community to live in a “big tent” after a Debian developer objected to the company’s sponsorship of Hyprland and its social media promotion of Omarchy, with both projects associated with politically polarizing viewpoints.

Antoine Beaupré, aka anarcat, demanded that Framework clarify its political position with regard to these two projects.

Hyprland, a Wayland compositor, is led by a “toxic and hateful community,” Beaupré observed, and Omarchy, a Linux distribution, comes from David Heinemeier Hansson (aka DHH), a controversial figure in the Ruby and Linux communities.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m amazed that they haven’t backtracked this yet. They’re just cool losing all those customers.

    • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      idk, looking at twitter, there seems to be a pretty good number of fascist techbros who are congratulating framework on this

      i guess framework doesn’t mind the change in audience…

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Bots pretending to be tech bros*

          Twitter is basically millions of Groks in a trenchcoat at this point.

          I don’t believe any kind of analysis that depends on measuring sentiment on social media given that it’s trivially easy to run hundreds or thousands of accounts on a 5 year old graphics card and some vibe coding.

      • TwilightNobody@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        It irks me to no end that both here and in the framework community forum people will try to downplay just how awful DHH and their ilk are.

        They’ll never say that they don’t mind supporting someone who’s transphobic, or a nationalist, or a racist. Instead they’ll just say that you need to separate the art from the artist, or that you’re just engaging in “purity tests” or whatever other bullshit reason they can throw to absolve themselves from supporting objectively shitty people.

      • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        In the current political environment, it’s profitable to have right-wing extremists alignments and they’re aren’t sigh, or even happy to be part of it.

        If the sales fall, there would have been or will be a “southpark-sorry.gif”

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Because if you’re out there grifting people for monetary gain, you’re not really a leftist.

          • jasory@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Left-wing podcasts churn huge amounts of money, Chapo Trapo House, Cool Zone Media etc… Individuals like Ibrahim X Kendi and the BLM project grafted away millions of dollars to buy mansions and luxury office space with do-nothing employees.

            Left-wing has no issue making money. Rubes come in all political affiliations.