So I am working on an Arduino project and have trouble communicating over UART.

I have a SIM7600G-H 4G Module from Waveshare and hooked it up to an Arduino Nano ESP32. The connections are as follows:

SIM7600<->Nano ESP32

TXD<->RX0

RXD<->TX0

VIN<->VUSB

GND<->GND

CTS<->D3

RTS<->D12

It mostly works, I can send AT commands and receive responds. However sometimes I only receive parts and chunks are missing or being send to the next command. I strongly suspect RSPs (“unsolicited result code”) to be the reason behind it. As documented in the manual RSPs are being send without an implicit action and happens for example if the module receives a call or SMS.

I have read about hardware flow control which seems to theoretically solve the problem of those module talking over each other and have connected the CTS and RTS pins to generic digital pins. According the manual the SIM Module it has hardware flow control enabled as an default.

On the Arduino side of things I have added these lines in hopes of enabling it, however I do not see a change, they do not return any error but I still see data missing. I have also tried swapping CTS and RTS just for fun, but without any luck.

Serial0.setPins(-1,-1,12,3);
Serial0.setHwFlowCtrlMode(UART_HW_FLOWCTRL_CTS_RTS);

Here are the logs which shows some responds being cut off.

20:57:47.991 -> Send AT command: AT
20:57:47.991 -> Response: AT
20:57:47.991 -> OK
20:57:47.991 -> 
20:57:47.992 -> Send AT command: AT+CPIN=1234
20:57:47.992 -> Response: AT+CPIN=1234      <- This responds ending is cut off
20:57:47.992 -> Send AT command: AT+CSQ
20:57:48.025 -> Response:                    <- This responds start is cut off
20:57:48.025 -> OK
20:57:48.025 -> 
20:57:48.025 -> Send AT command: AT+CREG=1
20:57:48.059 -> Response: AT+CREG=1
20:57:48.059 -> OK
20:57:48.059 -> 

And this is my function to send those commands.

char* SIMClass::send(const char* command) {
  // Clear buffer
  while (Serial0.available() > 0) Serial0.read();
  Serial.print("Send AT command: ");
  Serial.println(command);

  unsigned long timeout = millis() + 10000;
  char* response = (char*)malloc(1024 * sizeof(char));
  uint16_t index = 0;

  Serial0.print(command);
  Serial0.print("\r");


  while (Serial0.available() == 0) {
    if (millis() > timeout) {
      response[index] = '\0';
      return response;
    }
  }

  while (Serial0.available() > 0) {
    response[index++] = Serial0.read();
    timeout = millis() + 1000;
  }
  response[index] = '\0';
  Serial.print("Response: ");
  Serial.println(response);
  return response;
}

After enabling hardware flow control unsing Serial0.setHwFlowCtrlMode(UART_HW_FLOWCTRL_CTS_RTS) I expected Serial0.print(message) to wait until the SIM module is not busy and vice versa. Am I wrong in that assumption? Am I missing something else or is it maybe recommend to implement the hardware flow yourself?

  • bitfucker@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I assume you mean RXD to TX0. As for sporadic packets like that, I’d honestly check for the signal integrity. Maybe somehow the data line is picking up noise high enough to cause disturbance. It could be caused by a lot of things, but the most likely culprit are the connector/cable. Any connection going into/out of pcb should be checked. Or check your timing. Make sure the baud and other config (start, data, stop, parity) are matched. Small drift in baudrate is usually tolerable. UART is designed for async communication after all, meaning that any device may send anytime so CTS and RTS isn’t usually needed provided that it is a hardware UART (not bit banging). You can check out Ben Eater video about it. In short, the TX is usually held high, the RX then can detect a falling edge which is a signal that a packet is starting. The UART hardware then processes the signal according to the config that you give it and is usually able to do a DMA transfer.

    Edit: Ahh, after reading the code I suspect that your code processes the data faster than the module can send the full reply. The first loop that you are waiting for the first data to arrive, you immediately process everything in the buffer until it is empty, not knowing that maybe the module has not yet finished transmitting. CTS and RTS would not help since they are used to signal if both devices would like to (or probably could) send / receive data. Not signalling end of data transfer

    Edit 2, the solution: Either parse the received packet until the expected end, or wait until timeout before returning.

    • ChrysanthemumIndica@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d like to concur about reading the receive buffer faster than it is filled!

      Hopefully there is some end of line character that can be parsed for, but if not, a timeout should be fine like you said.

      Curious what baud rate is being used.

      • bitfucker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Since the posts are about SIM7600, and the example shows, it’s probably AT Command. So always newline delimited (either \r or \r\n)

        • ChrysanthemumIndica@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s fair, and sort of what I assumed, but I don’t quite have the experience to say for a fact, so much appreciated!

          Ironically I’ve only done modem stuff when I was very young and also somehow most of last year. But also maybe I get a little paranoid when it comes to talking to devices, and maybe I’m extrapolating my current i2c woes too far 😅

      • Bjarne@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The Serial on the ESP is set to 115200 as is the default of the module but can be overridden using commands. I should probably double check that. :) However I would assume that having a different baud rate would result in more errors than I am currently experiencing.

    • Bjarne@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thank you so much. That might actually be it. I didn’t had the time to fully implement that yesterday but will be today. I did however put in a sleep() after waiting for the buffer and reading it to validate your thesis, which results in complete data!! ^^

      Arduino even has an function for that readBytesUntil. However in my short testings yesterday in seemed to always stop on new lines, even if I set the char for it to stop on to something really silly. Reading it and implementing that stop on my own worked better. I wanna do it the “official” way though, it would then even respect an timeout set by setTimeout

      I will probably end up having CTS and RTS anyway cause I couldn’t make sure that the module starts to talk all of the sudden.

      I hate that the answer to my problems are always the most stupid ones. I kinda wish it would have been signal integrity, but I would probably regret that real fast too. :)

      • bitfucker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, CTS and RTS is useful for the module since you may overflow the module buffer (instead of the module overflowing your UART buffer). With proper HW flow control, hopefully your device UART respects the signal and pauses the tx until it is clear again without you having to code the pause yourselves. It can happen when the GSM bandwidth is lower than the UART bandwidth.

        The module suddenly talking should also be handled by your device UART gracefully. When your rx buffer is full for whatever reason (not reading it for a long time?), the module won’t be sending anymore data until you read your rx buffer. Theoretically, no data should be lost that way.