Tony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoThe Big Short Guy Just Bet $1 Billion That the AI Bubble Popsfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square245fedilinkarrow-up1868arrow-down118
arrow-up1850arrow-down1external-linkThe Big Short Guy Just Bet $1 Billion That the AI Bubble Popsfuturism.comTony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square245fedilink
minus-squareSorryQuick@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoBut if it saves time on some simple tasks, how can you say it’s not convenient?
minus-squareRiverRabbits@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·22 hours agothere is no task that is meaningful time saved by a kind of context-dependant lorem ipsum. The task is then not done, but simply rejected on its face.
minus-squareSorryQuick@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 hours agoI have no clue what you’re trying to say. If I ask an AI to write an email and it does so both better and faster than I could, how can you say it’s inconvenient and doesn’t save time?
But if it saves time on some simple tasks, how can you say it’s not convenient?
there is no task that is meaningful time saved by a kind of context-dependant lorem ipsum. The task is then not done, but simply rejected on its face.
I have no clue what you’re trying to say.
If I ask an AI to write an email and it does so both better and faster than I could, how can you say it’s inconvenient and doesn’t save time?