• htrayl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 天前

    A small critique of that project - a large portion of the websites included are simply personal sites for developers - nothing barely more technical than a business card or CV. I would exclude those or categorize them differently, as to me their “usefulness” seems relatively edge case.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 天前

      I clicked on 6 sites

      • 4 were personal portfolio sites

      • 1 was a personal blog

      • 1 was a web design company

      Pretty disappointing, and I’m not going to keep clicking on more in the hopes I find something interesting

      • dandu3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 天前

        I clicked on random and I got a tic tac toe that’s apparently purpose made. Works fine too

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 天前

      They are useful for those people though. You can put a QR code or URL on your business card and it will give people all the information they need for your businessor something.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 天前

        I don’t think anyone is arguing that having, like, websites are useful. But if they’re not particularly interesting then it doesn’t really fit here.

        The point of something like this is generally to come up with interesting/creative/useful things within arbitrary resource limits. Not just a bunch of really really limited boring stuff.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 天前

          That’s not one of their requirements. You might want to look at a different competition.

          • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 天前

            Yeah i dont get this complaint. This is just a label that people can qualify for, its not a competition or curated list of totally great websites. Its literally just like an energy efficiency sticker on a TV.