• kazerniel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    451: Unavailable due to legal reasons

    We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time. For any issues, contact [email protected] or call 541-749-5151.

    Aka, we can’t be bothered not to steal your data…

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      “In Oregon, it is not illegal to be naked in public. We do have a public indecency law and a private indecency law, but both of those have a required element," Miller said. “It has to be for the purpose of arousal for it to be illegal. That was not the case in this issue.”

      So, dude walking around with his junk hanging out? Not illegal. Dude jacking it in public? Illegal.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        for the purpose of arousal

        Dude jacking it in public? Illegal.

        Why? As long as he is jacking it for himself it should be allowed if the purpose is the deciding element.

          • entwine@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            But how do you evaluate if people are unconsenting about an act before the act takes place? That’d be premature evaluation.

          • plyth@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            In Oregon or all over the US?

            Would a brown paper bag in front of the private parts make it legal, like alcohol?

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Would be a fun defense to try:

          “Your honor, you’ve seen the video, nobody is aroused by that…”