• Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    On a tangent, I appreciate this bit in Daniel Whiteson’s answer:

    “I’m not a fan of categorizing things as ‘science’ or ‘not science,’ because who knows what nerdy curiosity will lead to a discovery?”

    And also in Thomas Van Riet’s answer:

    “People say that without experiment we cannot call one theory better than another. That is plain wrong. There are many consistency checks, which are ridiculously hard to pass. Can you compute black hole entropy? String theorists were able to compute it in very idealized circumstances and reproduced Hawking’s famous formula for black hole entropy!”

    You’ll sometimes see flat earthers, creationists, etc. taking a textbook definition of the Scientific Method, claim that anything that doesn’t do that is “not science”, and therefore wrong. Except that’s not at all how it works. The important part is gathering data to support your claims. That data could be experimental, but it could also be observational.

  • Jul (they/she)@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    News has a short attention span for juicy subjects, much shorter for complex, “boring” subjects. Especially ones that continue to be refined indefinitely. That’s what happened to it. Doesn’t have much to do with what is still happening to it in academia and research.

  • Ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Interviewer: Physicists, why is string theory dead?
    Physicists: It isn’t

    End of article

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      Eh, the responses are a bit more varied, ranging from “we have very low confidence, because it did not correctly predict several things” to “it’s the best unifying theory we have, by quite a bit”.

      In my opinion, worth a read for folks interested in string theory…

      • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        And don’t forget the “we’re doing great but we don’t expect to have testable predictions for another 950 years or so” guy.