LegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-22 days agoDo you like (AI) clocks?clocks.brianmoore.comexternal-linkmessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1399arrow-down113
arrow-up1386arrow-down1external-linkDo you like (AI) clocks?clocks.brianmoore.comLegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-22 days agomessage-square59fedilink
minus-squareSlurpingPus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-212 hours agoI dig the square clock, and am now sad that the numbers can’t be put into the corners on a real clock. Unless they’re shifted from the usual position.
minus-squarehuppakee@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-29 hours agoCartier found a work around quite some time ago and maybe they weren’t even the first to design a square ‘clock’: (The roman numerals are nice, but notice the ‘circle’ between the numerals and the hands, almost like the circle from the ai)
minus-squareSlurpingPus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-27 hours agoThat one is pretty good, though the Roman numerals are rather busy and uneven. This one is closer, though now I have to wonder if all non-square rectangular clocks have an old-timey whiff for me, or it’s just the border here: This is also impressive:
I dig the square clock, and am now sad that the numbers can’t be put into the corners on a real clock. Unless they’re shifted from the usual position.
Cartier found a work around quite some time ago and maybe they weren’t even the first to design a square ‘clock’:
(The roman numerals are nice, but notice the ‘circle’ between the numerals and the hands, almost like the circle from the ai)
That one is pretty good, though the Roman numerals are rather busy and uneven.
This one is closer, though now I have to wonder if all non-square rectangular clocks have an old-timey whiff for me, or it’s just the border here:
This is also impressive: