• pisaguchi@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Did you read the source? I guess no.

    "Our data suggest the evolution of a finely-tuned signalling system in which it is not the induction of an individual’s immune response, but rather its failure to overcome the infection, that triggers pupal signalling for sacrifice. "

    And as for sciencealert, their goal is to make science accessible to anyone. I think there is nothing wrong with also engaging it in an entertaining way. They also link the sources, so they are much better than other clickbaiters and you can read through original article to verify their writings.

    • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The article, as it is, is unscientific bullshit. Period.

      The words of Dr. Watson, as reported in the article, are unscientific bullshit. Period.

      You don’t have to “entertain” when talking about science, you have to inform, because when you make science accessible to everyone in this way, you are spreading ignorance and creating the substratum of pseudoscience, since common people won’t read the paper, or even click on the link. Maybe not even go past the title (which IS clickbait).

      • nullroot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I mean I agree with the sentiment, but that’s just scientists vying for eyes on their project and hopefully in turn the money to continue research. That’s literally just the way things are done. Don’t hate the player dawg.