Scientists are raising alarms about the potential influence of artificial intelligence on elections, according to a spate of new studies that warn AI can rig polls and manipulate public opinion.

In a study published in Nature on Thursday, scientists report that AI chatbots can meaningfully sway people toward a particular candidate—providing better results than video or television ads. Moreover, chatbots optimized for political persuasion “may increasingly deploy misleading or false information,” according to a separate study published on Thursday in Science.

Archive: http://archive.today/9Jq17

  • count_dongulus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Well my approach is:

    • Mark off every candidate who did not bother to provide a statement
    • Mark off every candidate with no listed volunteering experience in the little section for it
    • Mark off every candidate whose statement claims they will do things their desired office is not empowered to do
    • Mark off every candidate with a platform that doesn’t claim to be aiming for any kind of change or improvement in particular. (I don’t support chair warmers.)
    • Mark off every candidate whose email is a personal one listed as [email protected] or something else similarly unprofessional
    • Mark off any candidate aligned with the party that supported the coup attempt in 2021

    After this quick pass, which only takes a couple of minutes, I’m typically only left with two or three offices with more than one remaining choice to compare. I then read their platform and pick the candidate with the platform goal that seems most relevant to my or my community’s interest.