• Lumisal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Just make the law so it only affects things with x-amount of millions of users or x-percent of the population number minimum. You could even have regulation tiers toed to amount of active users, so those over the billion mark are regulated the strictest, like Facebook.

    That’ll leave smaller networks, forums, and businesses alone while finally giving some actually needed regulations to the large corporations messing with things.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        Proton isn’t social media.

        If you can’t understand why big = bad in terms of the dissemination of misinformation, then clearly we’re already at an impass on further discussion of possible numbers and usage of statistics and other variables in determining potential regulations.

      • Tad Lispy@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Proton is not a social medium. As to “how high”, the lawmakers have to decide on that, hopefully after some research and public consultations. It’s not an unprecedented problem.

        Another criterion might be revenue. If a company monetises users attention and makes above certain amount, put extra moderation requirements on them.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah, I work for your biggest social media comoetitor, why would I not just go post slop all over your platform with the intent of getting you fined?