I use KDE. Some use GNOME. Most other options are probably to be left out as X11 is unsafe.

Cosmic is not nearly finished, but will probably be a bit safer, as its in rust, even though not tested.

Then there are window managers like Sway, Hyprland, waymonad, wayfire, etc.

RaspberryPi also has their own Wayland Desktop.

Is every Wayland Desktop / WM equally safe, what are other variables here like language, features, control over permissions, etc?

  • corship@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You really should press Ctrl+alt+f3 on your lock screen and get your mind blown.

      • corship@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think you missed the point. Switch the tty to realize your de is irrelevant in regards to security, because you don’t even need one…

        • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wait until you want to watch a video, look at a photo, play a game or view a PDF lol

          • musicmatze@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can do all these things on a framebuffer. Ok, maybe the game thing is a bit of a hassle, but the other stuff is totally doable.

          • corship@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What the duck has this to do with anything.

            The entire point is that your DE has NO security features at all, those come ALL from the underlying system such as PAM for example, managing the authentication and such.

            These stupid strawmans “huhr dur watch a video”

            Besides that I’ll just answer the straw man argument anyway because it’s even stupid if you take it seriously YES YOU CAN ACTUALLY LAUNCH GUI (such as a game) DIRECTLY FROM TTY.

            And I quote

            LoL

            • berber@lemmy.chaos.berlin
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              a DE gives no security features that give your system additional security, yes. indeed, a running DE makesbyour system less secure, in some sense. but exactly here you can have less and more secure DEs, and some DEs have security features that make the DE itself more secure than other DEs.

        • sibloure@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would love to only use the computer in tty but would be hard to edit images in GIMP. Or do you still launch GUI apps directly from tty? Most websites are an abomination viewed through lynx or similar.

          • corship@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What the duck has this to do with anything.

            The entire point is that your DE has NO security features at all, those come ALL from the underlying system such as PAM for example, managing the authentication and such.

            These stupid strawmans “huhr dur watch a video”

            Besides that I’ll just answer the straw man argument anyway because it’s even stupid if you take it seriously YES YOU DO ACTUALLY LAUNCH GUI DIRECTLY FROM TTY.

    • berber@lemmy.chaos.berlin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      i don’t really get what people mean when they say this…

      when you get tty you still get no access, you need to log in as always. a DE/wm/any x11 session/a wayland session (even though wayland is more secure probs?) should pretty much always be less secure, as depending on what state it is in, what features it has, or what happens when certsin components crash somehow, you can more easily “hack” your way in that way than via doing a “ctrl+alt+F-key”. so i don’t get the whole “get tour mind blown” thing there, i have heard it multiple times.

      or am i missing something?

      • corship@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah you’re missing the point that the mind blown is just ironic.

        The entire point here was to demonstrate that the “security” features of these DEs are not implemented by the DE but by the underlying components such as PAM, and you can just ignore the DE until you have the basics fixed.

        What’s the point in having a super duper secure login screen if I can bypass it by booting from a USB stick for example.

        • berber@lemmy.chaos.berlin
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          reading your comments, you like to say that someone has “missed the point”.

          well, my point is, you should not ignore the DE. i mean, you can, if you can bypass the login as is, sure. but from a user perspective, you should not ignore it, because the DE is a potential security risk. e.g. if your screen lock crashes and whatnot.

          sure, yes indeed, your DE can be as secure as you want and it doesn’t matter if your underlying system is not secure. and yes indeed, with any non-encrypted drive, you can just mount the drives on another system (e.g. boot the computer from a USB drive). that almost goes without saying imo, and of course that’s why an encrypted drive is recommended.

          the question is, how easy is it to get to the stuff with an encrypted drive when the system is booted and the encrypted drive(s) is (are) mounted? it is not that easy. and there, the quality of your screen lock setup is the biggest risk factor, usually. if you can crash your DE/WM somehow, if it is not setup right with your display manager or something, then you might be able to get into a login (and interactive) shell of that user (maybe because it is the parent process of your WM that you started with startx).

          if you “allow” your potential attacker to reboot from a usb stick, then it is obvious that your DE doesn’t matter at all pretty much.

          • corship@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well especially if the previous comment asked “or am I missing something”.

            Obviously I could be wrong that’s why I said I THINK

            • berber@lemmy.chaos.berlin
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              the “missing something” was with regards to what i said about ctrl+alt+F-something not giving some extra attack point. missing something that would blow my mind. if you say the mind blowing is ironic or whtever then it doesn’t matter anyway.