• Scrollone@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I despise AI. I don’t want it in my browser. If I want to use AI, I’ll go to Mistral or Claude.

    • Auth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      So no text to voice/voice to text, no translation, no ocr, no summarization, no scam detection? These are useful ai features to have in a browser IMO.

      • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Plugins exist. There is no excuse for bloat8ng the browser with these seldom used niche features by default, espexially when they represent 5% if what the AI component is doing and the other 95% are harmful to literally every living thing on the planet.

        • Auth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I dont consider any of those features to be bloat. “Harmful to every living thing on the planet” wtf are you referring to here?

            • Auth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              none of those features are slop. They are amazingly useful features. Removing them from the hands of average users by putting them behind an extension would make Firefox a much worse option and exclude a ton of people for no reason.

              Your opinion is based on nothing and you have no idea what you’re talking about. You’re just a reactionary.

            • Auth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              There is only an environmental impact in AI in training in the places that have water issues or use fossil fuels on the grid. Otherwise its the same as any other power use.

              Plus model training costs arent relevant to firefox. We dont factor in the power usage for creating the linux kernel when we talk about linux or any other software. There isnt any good reason we should care about 3rd party companies power generation costs. I dont think about how much power the steel plant used to build my car nor should I.

              • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                And what say you of the preliminary evidence suggesting that using AI is making people less capable of thinking for themselves, or people becoming emotionally attached to AI girlfriends/boyfriends, or people who killed themselves either intentionally or accidentally by following LLM advice, or the fact that an overwhelmibg majority of companies who made AI a crucial part of their functioning are losing money or going bankrupt? These are part of the social cost and they all point quite strongly towards it being a very bad idea to rely on AI for anything.

    • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You mean the same Claude from Anthropic? The same Anthropic working with Palantir?

      And then you are here shitting on Mozilla…

      You guys are a joke!