• PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Man, this whole post has been embarrassing for you. Oof.

    I can’t help but notice youve once again failed to address prefix and postfix notations.
    And that you’ve not actually made any argument other than “nuh uh”
    Not to mention the other threads you’ve been in. Yikes.

    We can all tell you’re not a maths teacher.

    • Man, this whole post has been embarrassing for you

      Nope. I’m the only one who has backed up what they’ve said with Maths textbooks 🙄

      I can’t help but notice youve once again failed to address prefix and postfix notations.

      What is it that you want addressed?

      And that you’ve not actually made any argument other than “nuh uh”

      Backed up by Maths textbooks 🙄

      We can all tell you’re not a maths teacher

      Says person who actually isn’t a Maths teacher, hence no textbooks 😂

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Your argument you haven’t made is backed up by math textbooks you haven’t provided written for children.

        What is it that you want addressed?

        How can that specific order of operations be a law of mathematics if it only applies to infix notation, and not prefix or postfix notations? Laws of mathematics are universal across notations.

        Show me a textbook that discusses other notations and also says that order of operations is a law of mathematics.
        You don’t have it, and you also aren’t a maths teacher, or a teacher at all. Just because you say it a lot doesn’t make it true.