• about a page saying “other rules may have been adopted” suggests anything others than that different rules may have been adopted?

    says person revealing they haven’t read about the history behind that comment 🙄

    You know by know that no-one but you agrees with your interpretations.

    All the textbooks agree dude, which you would know if you had read more, but you’ve chosen to remain an ignorant gaslighter

    You can’t find a single explicit agreement with them

    With what?

    Reposting the same pages that you are misinterpreting is very silly, isn’t it

    says person who can’t post anything that agrees with their silly interpretation 🤣🤣🤣

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      says person revealing they haven’t read about the history behind that comment

      answer the question, deflecter :)

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The contents of the book day nothing about the “rules” only about the symbols, so lining this book doesn’t answer the question.

          In general, responding to a question with “you haven’t read enough” is, indeed, deflection, and is a sign you can’t answer. If you could, you would! Simple.