This image was created by /u/[email protected] for this comment here: https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/21735989. I had encouraged them to post it somewhere, but as far as I can tell, they never did.

Panel 1: “Installing Windows 20 years ago” screenshot of install wizard with just a couple buttons
Panel 2: “Installing Linux 20 years ago” screenshot of a busy command line
Panel 3: “Installing Windows today” screenshot of a busy command line
Panel 4: “Installing Linux today” screenshot of install wizard with just a couple buttons

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You say so yet 10 is fast, convienient and easy to use. Wouldn’t call it better than 7, but it was good.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Nah, 10 is the primordial ooze from which all the current vile evil coming out of microsoft was formed.

        7 was faster, more convenient, less in your way, and just overall a superior product. No microsoft OS has even equaled what 7 was, much less be superior to it.

        • Demdaru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Straight up said I wouldn’t call 10 better than 7. So what’s your point? 10 is, overall, good OS. Not best, not great, good.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            45 minutes ago

            Straight up said I wouldn’t call 10 better than 7. So what’s your point?

            10 is the primordial ooze from which all the current vile evil coming out of microsoft was formed.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        fast, convenient and easy to use

        I wonder how it feels compared to AntiX Linux.

        [Or VoidLinux with any Window Manager. ~ for different strokes a little further into the FOSS adventure.]

        • Demdaru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I feel like the very moment we go for any linux aimed at being lightweight, windows loses due to cramming cramming as much compatibility and tools as is possible inside.

          …and also you got me intrested in AntiX. I have old laptop that struggles even with Debian…wonder if that would work on it.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Even 2000, it was the roller coaster starting its decent, worsening after NT. Barely indistinguishable, but there were clues, the trajectory had started to tip down.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I think it was Windows 2000 I had to install on a laptop for someone…

          This was 20+ years ago, so I dont remember the details…but i think there was like 11-13 floppies for the install that I had at the time? All of them OEM floppies… I think from microsoft, but maybe from the laptop OEM?.. and every time I ran the installer another disk would fail, and i’d have to go online and find that disk image and burn it to a replacement floppy. It was the worst OS install experience of my entire life, lol. I think by the time I was done I had replaced all but the first oem disk.