• Jumbie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    You said, “I buy my food to eat it, not look at it.”

    Now you’re claiming the opposite while also establishing your personal preference as the standard for non-shitty.

    Do you see how this is confusing to anyone reading your comments?

    • Manticore@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      How am I claiming the opposite? I prefer food that is nice to eat. I continue to maintain I prefer food that is nice to eat. I enjoy home-grown tomatoes. I don’t buy supermarket tomatoes because they are not nice to eat.

      Did you miss the part where ‘shitty’ is a personal assessment with no objective value? If all you care about is profit margins, then hybrid breeds aren’t shitty, that’s why they use them. But I’m not a person who sells fruit, I’m a person who eats them. Therefore, shitty is a measure of how nice they are to eat.

      You are a stranger on the internet. I thought you were asking why a person might consider them shitty, and I answered in good faith. Then you made it obvious you just want to sea lion.

      If you think my job is to convince you why you think they’re shitty, that makes no fucking sense, and I’m not going to do that. Your opinions are yours. Enjoy your water balloons.

      • Jumbie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I don’t think we’re speaking the same language. I already laid it out for you.

        I’ll remain confused. Thanks for the conversation.