• deHaga@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Firefox is just Google’s proxy. Proxy wars are very cold war-esque

      Edit. 90% of FF revenue is royalties from Google to stop anti trust lawsuits

  • Maiznieks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Tabs on side and adblock is all i care about. I wish firefox management was doing less harm to firefox, but it’s still better than chrome.

    • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      That’s why I use Vivaldi

      Oh and this is my 666th comment here on this Lemmy instance, a lot more than Hexbear. Seriously!

    • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Fuck off with your both sides bullshit.

      One is a company trying to drive itself into the ground and getting stopped left and right by the 12 of us who still believe in the mission.

      One is a homophobic crypto-scammer upset at getting kicked out of the other org.

      Edit: Speak of the devil, this just showed up in my all: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/36237549

      Despite the similarities in phrasing, no idea who that person is.

        • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          They seem fine as far as I know. I think it isn’t that stable in my experience, but I’m not aware of them doing anything bad. The only other browser I’ve heard of being questionable (besides chrome/edge obviously) is waterfox where it got bought by an ad-oriented company but has supposedly stayed separate from the ad part of the business. Could be a long-term trap, I suppose, but a trap for like 0.01% of the browser market doesn’t seem that useful.

          • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I think the best part about Vivaldi is that it lets you put the tabs to the side, and also has a built-in ad-and-tracker-blocker, despite letting you install ad-block extensions (because Vivaldi is a Chromium browser). Seriously!

      • pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I mean I don’t like that Mozilla donations finance weird congresses on Africa, that sounds like they are going to SPAs and getting a lot of sex with donation money instead of improving FF.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        there is none, unfortunately. the best you can do is Firefox forks. i use zen, some people use librewolf, but that doesn’t change the fact that Mozilla is getting worse every day. idk how we can get past that other than having another whole ass foundation that invests in a new browser.

  • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    From the Brave website:

    Beyond this core engine, Brave has built in tons of custom features atop that open-source Chromium core:

    • Built-in ad blocker
    • YouTube ad blocker
    • AI assistant

    Yeah, no. I’ll stick with LibreWolf.

    • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah. That’s where I went. If AI is good enough - it should sell itself. All these browsers have plugins. I see no reason to bake it in unless there’s an alteror motive.

      Everyone’s in a hurry to milk that AI cow… Its a shame about the taste tho.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Not to mention that the CEO of Brave is a homophobic bigot. Good enough for me to boycott as a cis het male.

      • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Edit 2:

        I derped. See below. Speed reading and alcohol make for a less than ideal combination. The eggnog is still tasty though. Leaving it up for transparency.

        het male

        You can call somone a bigoted piece of shit without literally including a group who have fuck all to do with him or his shit opinions. Let’s be better than the exact thing you are calling out. I was with you right up to the last two words which were utterly unnecessary.

        Edit:

        On second reading I’m not clear on the intent of the last statement. I’ll ammend my statement after clarification 👍

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I don’t need to explain myself to you, but I will indulge you nonetheless because of the message I’m trying to spread, even though your attitude off the bat really sucked. 😛

          I added it because I want to normalize that you can support something or boycott something even though not doing so doesn’t affect you directly. You can stand up for something because it’s right, not just because you stand to gain something from it.

          It’s meant to normalize solidarity, which we see very little of in today’s humanitarian and political climate.

          I hope that satisfies you and maybe think one step further before jumping to criticize so quickly. You did make an edit but it didn’t do too much with its demanding tone.

          Happy continuation of the holidays to you.

          • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Considering the edit I made after rereading it - I had difficulty determining if you were firing shots or describing yourself. Speed reading and eggnog mix about as well as one would expect. In short - I’m not here to pick a fight where there isn’t one.

            I’m perfectly happy that my original interpretation was incorrect and will amend my comments as my edit suggested. I understand a lot of marginalized groups are frequently hurt and can lash out generically against the group that hurt them. Its not fun being included in that - which was the intent of my original statement.

            Appreciate the reply - cheers and well wishes. 👍

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              No worries, you owned up to the mistake in a very nice manner. We’re cool, you’re a good person.

              Happy new years, eh!

              • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I’ll admit my booze and nutmeg loaded brain tripped over the acronyms and by the time it processed I’d posted and moved on. A moment later: “holdup…”

                Apologies for the mistake again - and here’s hoping 2026 is kind to us 🍻

  • Guillermosaenz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If you want a low-drama setup: Firefox + uBlock Origin + tweak Enhanced Tracking Protection to ‘Strict’. Brave is solid too, but I’ve had a few sites act weird with the defaults.

    • Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah, it’s strange that they are getting so much hate for an upcoming AI feature… which will be easily able to be turned off.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Because they aren’t trusted. AI anything is not trusted. The concern is they will chip away at the ability to turn it off later like Google is doing with Gemini.

      • edinbruh@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Stupid argument. None of the various Firefox forks has any chance to keep existing without Firefox. You should still cheer for Firefox

            • gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I support the Firefox Ideal, but don’t support the new direction.

              So [email protected] works best for me.

              And Firefox do have telemetry for whose using the forks anyhow, so they know when they lose customers due to their terrible decisions

          • edinbruh@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Right, let me rephrase “no Firefox fork worth using has any chance to maintain meaningful existence without upstream Firefox”

            I’m sure many forks will go on surviving from scraps if Firefox disappeared tomorrow. But they wouldn’t get anything useful done.

            Let me put this into perspective, Microsoft (a trillion dollar company that would benefit enormously from rolling their own browser engine) didn’t have the resources for maintaining a browser engine.

            • i_love_FFT@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              A for-profit company “not having resources” usually means that the product department decided it’s not worth investing. Doesn’t tell us anything about the actual effort required to maintain such a software.

              • edinbruh@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Yes, but you can think for yourself and you and Amy product manager know how much they would benefit (just as much as Google and Apple, other for profit companies of the same caliber) and you know they would have the means to produce such software (just like Apple and Google). So, knowing that they still decided it’s not worth the investment, you can infer that the cost would be immense.

                Also, all the other points still stand.

            • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              See related: pfsense and opnsense.

              Its entirely possible for a fork to survive if the cause is supported. Both things can still exist provided there is interest and support.

              Switching browsers isn’t hard. For now, personally, I’ll take the fork that isn’t trying to literally be the “yo dog…” meme.

    • titanicx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Firefox, the AICentric browser of the future! We are here to fuck you over just like everyone else!

      • YaGirlAutumn@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Firefox one of the few browsers that lets you turn off the shitty ai features vs brave the browser that forses shit down your throat uses you to crptomine and is owned by a bigoted piece of shit!

      • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        GenAi Centric browser that uninstalls itself with an GenAi kill switch :p

        (but for real: firefox is nice because its not chromium and allows nicer firefox based browsers)

  • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    My main criteria for a browser is not being Chrome or Chromium based.

    This leaves my only options being Firefox and it’s forks.

    Or Microsoft Edge which stifles laughter I’m not gonna do.

    Currently on Firefox but might give Librewolf a try.

    Edit: I’ve been told Edge is also Chromium based now, the Firefox ecosystem really is the last holdout huh?

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        As alternatives to webkit/chromium/gecko browsers go, I like ladybird’s speed of progress and their mentality of doing everything themselves (no external dependencies), but Kling’s political views are concerning. Servo is going slower but still making progress (fell behind in implementing web standards), and both are kinda terrible in terms of speed afaik

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Edge is Chromium-based. It’s also not (functionally) half bad, because, well, it’s chromium based, but that obviously comes with all the other drawbacks

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        My workplace is basically as close to 100% Microsoft as you can get. When I started I figured “hey let’s try out this new Edge browser and see if it’s as good as people are saying” and y’know what, it’s had some nice features that Chrome lacks that I really appreciate.

        However Microsoft entirely killed it for me by recently making every browser profile automatically sign into the Microsoft account that Windows is signed into. I was using different profiles to use different Microsoft accounts for managing Microsoft services so now I have my named account everywhere instead of the correct admin account that actually has access to more than the bare minimum. Literally entirely defeated the purpose of browser profiles. So I switched to Firefox at work because I can use the tab container feature for the same purpose and have fewer windows open at once as an added benefit

      • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s moreso that it’s under Microsoft’s thumb. See all the tech companies are unreliable and out for you data but Microsoft also consistently fumbles on everything. They made Windows and Office then just stopped doing anything new and kept making their old products worse.

        Xbox is practically dead, they bought Minecraft and you can feel the vultures circling overhead, even the AI bubble they’re just funding OpenAI and making slight adjustments for their own versions.

        I’m planning on jumping ship to Linux when I make a new PC. Only thing Microsoft I even consider using nowadays is VScode.

          • gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Brand Tribalism only supports the brands, don’t fall for their bullshit.

            iOS and Android and Microsoft and Linux users are all just as smart as each other.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              I said tech savvy, not smart. This isn’t brand tribalism, it comes directly from what you are and aren’t able to do with the OS compared to alternatives.

              • gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                You can install other browsers without being tech savvy, it was legally mandated that they allow it after them and Microsoft got sued for anti-competition laws by the EU

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  I wasn’t just referring to browsers, I was referring to the design philosophy as a whole and the type of users it draws.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Safari breaks everything though. Tons of sites out there flat out do not work properly with safari and at this point we all know that’s intentional.

  • 4am@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    238
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Brave has crypto minded shit built in, and they “protect you” by running their own tracking network, so they can be the exclusive sellers of the data.

    Fuck brave.

    • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Saved your comment so I can quote it anytime I see somebody try to push Brave on someone else. It’s like the Jehovah’s Witnesses of browsers Istg.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      1 day ago

      crypto minded shit built in

      It’s opt-in.

      they can be the exclusive sellers of the data.

      You just described every single internet service that you’re not actively paying for.

      Fuck Brave.

      I respect your opinion, even if it’s silly.

      • Sleepkever@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Then we point to the in opt-out able donation systems they embedded into YouTube. The money goes directly to brave unless claimed and even if the content creators are against donations for their content (like Tom Scott) it’s never refunded.

        Or we point to their affiliate links they embedded in every link to crypto sites for a while. Or the one site that recommends them as the best privacy browser that’s actually run by a Brave employee.

        Everytime they fix it in a few weeks and tell everyone they will be better. And every time they find some other way to manipulate websites you are viewing for their gain after a year or so.

        At this point it’s not the current state anymore, it’s the track record of the company that just scummy that should make you lose trust in them, but apparently their ad campaign is so effective everyone just sees the default ad blocking…

      • Lytia @lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        It’s opt-in.

        Yeah, the part that makes you money is. Still have to manually disable all of the popups and icons begging you to use it.

        You just described every single internet service that you’re not actively paying for.

        Difference is those sites don’t necessarily advertise themselves as “privacy respecting”

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    > talks about monetizing your data

    > monetizes your data

    Brave still doing that fucking crypto shit in your browser?

    • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Ah, so the classic “Every accusation a confession.”

      Thought this was sort of a wild claim about Firefox out of left field. No wonder.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      I had a coworker excitedly tell me that he had earned a total of $12 MXN ($0.67 USD) from Brave. 🤦‍♂️

      • gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        BETTER IT NOT EXIST AT ALL

        If I went to a restaurant, they placed a hot steaming stinky turd sandwich on my table and then went “oh, but you don’t have to have it”, I still wouldn’t fucking eat there.

        Why should we be okay with the Turd Sandwich that is crypto being served by Brave being opt-in???

        • Mcf0603@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s not how restaurants work dude. It’s more akin to being asked if you want to hear today’s specials before you order.

          • gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            There’s a thing called metaphor. A hyperbolic one in this case.

            I know that’s not how restaurants work.

            And no, it’s not like being asked about the specials, as they don’t cook it and serve it without asking first.

            They bring out the hot fresh steaming crypto shit sandwich to you whether you want it or not, and then go “oh, but you don’t have to have it, if you don’t want”