Not with wars fought the Israeli way. Fair point.

I know schoolteachers who can’t get kids to pay attention to anything for more than 60 seconds, even when it’s literally written on the board in front of them. I don’t like age verification either, but people are burying their heads in the sand about how harmful these applications are to developing brains, and IMHO age verification is the lesser evil.

30% of their kids off of social media is a huge success.

You sound like a gun supporter in the US: “It’s not perfect and is, therefore, not worth doing at all.”

Absolutely right.

I’d love to see 30% reduction in kids being on these platforms globally. That would be a good start.

A 30% reduction of kids being exposed to these harmful platforms is a good thing and I’m glad to see it.

Also, all laws are imperfect, and expecting 100% efficacy is moronic.

Yes, but it’s not like that’s a rare trait for presidents or national leaders throughout the history of the US.

One of the only good things about Donald, historically, was his reticence for war and disentangling the US from foreign wars, such as with Syria and Afghanistan. All that’s out the window now that he needs a way to supercharge his grift before November and also to distract from his raping of kids.

Oh yeah.

And the irony is Donald ran on ending foreign wars and affordability whereas Democrats ardently insisted to voters that they had to say the things the billionaires wanted them to in order to win.

Americans aren’t keen on reading history. It’s partly how we ended up electing a man who paid smarter people to write his term papers.

Can’t say we’re particularly keen on empathy either.

True, and it will create a debt. As new advances are made, the US will be paying a premium to access them, thanks to the ‘bull in a china shop’ foreign policy of Donald and his cronies.

Clearly.

I would recommend you go look up the word ‘effective’. That will help with your confusion. Good day to you.

Incorrect.

That it is still a law on the books does not make it ‘active’. There is a law here in Kansas City that still bans automobiles on Main St., but I wouldn’t call it ‘active’, and nor should anyone else.

It was ditched, and with good reason. (At least for the the Epstein Class.)

I just relish not only the thought of the pain he might experience with these, but also the blows to his self-presumed masculinity and patriarchal authority.

Vibe coding, baby.

Legit endangering our brave spacefarers.

In a video posted to X, Hegseth said he is signing a memo that will direct base commanders to allow requests for troops to carry privately owned firearms “with the presumption that it is necessary for personal protection.”

Um.

Why?

This is why the US ditched the draft after the Vietnam War.

The only time we ever had a meaningful anti-war movement was when people were forced to send their own kids to die. Having a “volunteer” force eliminates that. The excuse is always that people signed up for it, and people just ignore that it’s the poor and minorities who are still effectively pressed into military duty due to manufactured lack of opportunity.

“Peace through Strength”

Totally, man. I listen to Donald talk and the first thing I think about is Teddy Roosevelt and speaking softly carrying a big stick. Absolute tough guy and not an insecure, fat, stupid, limpdick overindulged piece of shit being exploited for personal gain by every single person in his orbit.

/s

I hope he has ass or ball cancer.

Correct, and the FBI inadvertently admitted it publicly by releasing video in the Guthrie abduction case that shouldn’t exist.

Every device with a wireless connection and a GPS, camera, or microphone is surveilling you.

Can confirm. Am dozen.

That reminds me.

Time to go watch Love on the Spectrum.