• smeenz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This was “proved” in 1915, and many many times since then. The article just talks about how relativity describes how gravity affects the progression of time

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Half a millisecond per day? No way it’s true. Half a microsecond, that’s more like it.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      We measured it this time…

      We knew what the measurements would show, but still, no one had done it yet.

      Not groundbreaking, not surprising, but science is ratchet is this was an incremental step that once done can be built on.

      Eventually we’re gonna have to prove all this shit anyways.

      Edit:

      The fact that it’s not stable is pretty cool too. Very small variety, but still, on a very very small scale that may matter.

      • loppy@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 days ago

        The authors of the original article cited by this news outlet did not measure any time on Mars in any way. They did a theoretical calculation of the time difference with Earth based on astronomical data about Mars like mass, orbit, etc.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Time runs faster on Mars and scientists just proved it provided evidence

    Rampant, shitty epistemology is a huge sign that popular “science” is busted.

  • Brusque@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    Imagine the wall peaking you could pull off on Mars, Counter Strike 7 is gonna be lit.